top of page

C.W. v. Roselle Board of Education: What New Jersey Child Sexual Abuse Lawyers and Survivors Need to Know

  • Writer: Alexander J. Kemeny
    Alexander J. Kemeny
  • Jan 27
  • 4 min read

Understanding the Facts, Court’s Reasoning, and Legal Impact on Abuse Survivors


NJ sexual abuse survivor lawsuit, C.W. v. Roselle Board of Education

If you or a loved one survived child sexual abuse in New Jersey and are considering legal action, but worry about legal technicalities, the case of C.W. v. Roselle Board of Education is a critical decision to understand.


Decided on January 15, 2026, by the New Jersey Appellate Division, this opinion highlights how longstanding legal rules regarding claims against public entities (like schools) affect survivors

even decades after the abuse occurred.


Key Takeaways from C.W. v. Roselle Board of Education: A survivor sued a school board for abuse occurring in 2004–2005. The Barrier: The NJ Tort Claims Act (TCA) previously required $3,600 in medical expenses to claim "pain and suffering" damages. The Change: A 2025 amendment eliminated this $3,600 "monetary threshold" specifically for sexual abuse claims. The Ruling: The Court ruled the 2025 amendment is not retroactive. This means cases already dismissed or litigated under the old rules may not benefit from the change.


🧩 Case Summary: What Happened?


The Plaintiff (“C.W.”) alleged he was sexually abused in 2004–2005 by a middle school teacher employed by the Roselle Board of Education (RBOE). While the teacher was removed and terminated in 2007, C.W. did not file his lawsuit until 2020. He asserted several claims, including violations of the New Jersey Child Sex Abuse Act (CSAA) and Negligence. Despite the severity of the allegations, the school board moved for summary judgment, asking the court to dismiss the case based on a technicality in the law.



⚖️ The Legal Hurdle: The "Monetary Threshold"


Under the version of the New Jersey Tort Claims Act (N.J.S.A. 59:9-2(d)) in effect when the case was filed, a plaintiff suing a public entity for "pain and suffering" had to prove they incurred at least $3,600 in medical expenses.


Because C.W. did not seek immediate counseling or medical treatment in the years following the abuse, he could not meet this $3,600 requirement. The trial court held that without meeting this "monetary threshold," he was legally barred from recovering damages for his emotional trauma.



🏛️ The Appeal: Is the New 2025 Law Retroactive?


While C.W.’s appeal was pending, the New Jersey Legislature passed P.L. 2025, c. 29. This historic amendment finally eliminated the $3,600 threshold for survivors of sexual abuse.

C.W. argued that this new, fairer law should apply to his case. However, the Appellate Division disagreed. The court ruled that in New Jersey, new laws are presumed to apply "moving forward" unless the Legislature explicitly says they apply "backward." Because the 2025 amendment did not state it was retroactive, the court affirmed the dismissal.



🙋 FAQ: How This Decision Affects Your Rights


The C.W. decision raises many questions for survivors currently considering their legal options. Here are the most common concerns we hear:


Does the $3,600 medical expense rule still apply to sexual abuse cases?


For new cases: No. If you are filing a claim today, the 2025 legislative update protects you. Survivors of sexual abuse are no longer required to show $3,600 in medical or counseling bills to sue a public entity for pain and suffering.


Can I sue a school district even if the abuse happened decades ago?


Yes. New Jersey has significantly expanded the "Statute of Limitations" for survivors of child sexual abuse. Depending on your specific timeline, you may be able to file a claim even if you are now in your 40s or 50s. However, because public entities have unique rules, you should consult an attorney immediately to check your specific deadlines.


What if I never went to a doctor or therapist after the abuse?


Previously, this was a major barrier. Under the old Tort Claims Act, "subjective" emotional trauma without financial proof (bills) often led to cases being dismissed. Now, the law recognizes that the trauma of abuse is real regardless of whether you could afford or sought treatment at the time.


What is the difference between the CSAA and the TCA?


  • CSAA (Child Sexual Abuse Act): This is the law that allows you to sue the abuser and the organization.


  • TCA (Tort Claims Act): These are the "rules of the road" you must follow if that organization is a public entity (like a public school). The TCA has very strict notice requirements that do not apply to private institutions.



📌 Why You Need an Experienced New Jersey Child Sex Abuse Lawyer


As the C.W. decision proves, the "date of filing" and the specific version of the law in play at that moment can make or break a case.


Public entities frequently use "technicalities"—like the monetary threshold or late Notice of Claim filings—to get cases dismissed before a jury ever hears the facts. At Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC, we understand the nuances of both the Child Sex Abuse Act and the Tort Claims Act. We ensure that your case is built on a solid procedural foundation so that your voice can truly be heard.



📞 Take the Next Step Toward Justice


If you are a survivor of child sexual abuse in New Jersey, don't let a legal technicality silence you. The legal landscape has shifted, and you may now have a path to justice that was previously blocked. Contact the New Jersey child sex abuse lawyers at Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC today for a free consultation. Call (732) 853-1725 to make an appointment.

bottom of page